DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL TRADITION IN CUBA
(A comment on the Declaration of Viña del Mar, according to the Church Social Doctrine perspective) 

By Dagoberto Valdés Hernández





INTRODUCTION
ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF DEMOCRACY
FAITHFUL TO THE POLITICAL TRADITION IN CUBA
THE DEEPEST CHANGE TOWARDS A NEW DEMOCRACY
DIMENSIONS OF GOVERNANCE IN DEMOCRACY
GRADUALITY: THE WAY TO PERFECTIONING OUR DEMOCRACY
CONCLUSIONS

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


INTRODUCTION

Cuba has logically found "a space for reflection and cooperation" in the Ibero American Community during the summits yearly held. These summits have strengthened the space for dialogue and agreement that preapre our region for "a challenge in the threshold of the 21th century: the promotion and consolidation of economic and social sustainable and sustained development; the deepening, widenning and strengthening of the processe of integration (regional); and the insertion in a world that is deeply changing". ( Declaration of Viña del Mar No. 3)
The 6th Summit held in Santiago de Chile and Viña del Mar during the past 10th and 11th November, added another chalenge: "to accelerate the political development in order to fulfill the demands for a more participative society, as an important condition to assimilate and possitively influence on changes on a world-wide scale. The need for strengthenning our democracies is thus a permanent task; we have to make them more efficient, participative and transparent. This need was recognized in this Final Declaration by all Heads of States and by the governments of the 21 Ibero American countries. The president of our contry was also there.
This reflection, dialogue and strengthening of our democracies, is an endeavor that must be followed by all citizens. Responding to the exhortation made by the Heads of States, I have accepted the polite invitation made by the Dominican Fathers to do this reflection on the Declaration of Viña del Mar according to the church social doctrine and its implementation in Cuba, in correspondance with the democratic tradition of our history.
When the classroom "Fr. Bartolomé de Las Casas" was inaugurated in 1995, I had the opportunity to participate by making a reflection on the Copenhague Summit. Now that this classroom has got a high prestige, I appreciate the honor and the commitment of sharing with you as a cuban and as a catholic, these opinions about democracy and governance.
As a member of the people, which is the subject of sovereignty in every democracy, I share what I live, what I dream and what I think. Thinking about the good for Cuba I respond to the call of the summit that suggests us "ensure an active representation and participation of the population, trying to strengthen societies through the opinions and initiatives.These are essential conditions for the open and transparent debate in public life". (Declaration of Viña del Mar. 5 )

UP


ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF DEMOCRACY

Democracy is a topic which is being discussed nowadays all over the world.
In our present world, debates are focussed on the topic of democracy. It is an ever increasing diccussion because thank God, every day there is a growing number of voices in favor of democratic processes and the support given to them is more universal and stable. After 1989 many walls have fell down, showing the essence of the so-called popular democracies.
On the other hand, we are already aquainted with the flaws of the so-called western democracies, with their un-stability, corruption and the manipulation which is behind another kind of walls: the walls of propaganda and ideology. These walls hide the poverty abyss they are in.
Democracy is diminished if there is not social and economic development. And it is also diminished by the lack of political and civil liberties.
I wish to point out from the very beginning in this analysis, that I don't believe in neither of those two "mirages". I believe that there is not a contemporary society which is able to show a perfect model of democracy, effective and totally transparent.
Democracy, as every dynamic social process, is constantly changing and going through a permanent process of questionning: sometimes the changes are forward, sometimes they are backward; sometimes the citizen conciousness grow together with participation; some other times there is a better articulation of the state structures that allow a growing civic protagonism.
From now on, we won't imitate any other foreign model or canonize any internal status. I believe that in Cuba, as in the rest of the world, there isn't a model of perfect democracy, not totally finished, or static, or unchangeable. Regarding these social and political topics, the extremes are always fake and isolation is too fatal, the same as dependance and imitations which don't take into account the culture and characteristics of each nation.
The present Church Social Doctrine promotes a strong support to democracy as a system, whereas it assures the citizen participation in political choices and garantees them the possibility of changing their rulers if necessary through a pacific way.
That's why the church cannot favor the creation of restricted groups of leaders that try to fulfill individual or ideological purposes, or steal the power from the state" (Centessimus Annus 46)
Today, some aspects have changed regarding democracy, governance and other concepts. Dependency has turned into respectful interdependence which is usefull to everyone; isolation and political and geographic stuburnness have turned into integration which is not harmful, on the contrary: integration is richfull because it tests and purifies national sovereignty getting the latter a new dimension. That's why, during the VI Ibero American Summit, the Heads of States, on behalf of the peoples they represent, could ratify some characteristics and commitments that are considered as "essential components of democracy". We could say these components belong to all democratic traditions inherited from the most authentic aspect of Ibero

American culture, from the International Right, founded by Francisco de Victoria in Salamanca, Spain, up to the Declaration of Viña del mar in Chile.
These elements are accepted by everyone without exception because they are essential. Through them, we can evaluate our democratic processes. They are the following (according to the Declaration of Viña del Mar in chapter 4):
1- Independence of powers and mutual control
2-The proper representation and participation of majorities and minorities.
3-Freedom of expression, meeting and association.
4-Full access to information.
5-Free periodical and transparent elections of rulers.

These five essential elements will help us to analyze the situation in Cuba as objectively as possible. But first, it is important that we point out two "conditions for cooperation" in this matter which was establised in the 6th Summit in Chapters 8 and 9 of its Final Declaration These two conditions are:
a) "Inconditional respect to sovereignty, territorial integrity, self determination and independence of each country. These conditions demand the national tradition to be respected and demands the possibility of choosing the means, the instruments and mechanisms by every nation".
b) "Rejection of any kind or intention to alter the institutional order". the former Summits "established a consultation procedure in relevant urgent cases that have been allowed to do negotiations and agreements in defence of democratic values and sovereignty..."
Indeed, these two conditions and those five elements are enough to establish an environment that favor the implementation of improvements in our political system.
It is importat first:
-to come to an agreement in a minimum of aspects.
-to implement measures which garantee citizen peace, the acknowledgement of national institutions and the respect for national political tradition.

UP


FAITHFUL TO THE POLITICAL TRADITION IN CUBA

Cuba is a relatively young independent country. It only is 95 years old. We remember precisely Cuba's birthday this year (unfortunately there is no official celebration). The Homeland's birthday is like a mother's birthday. We remember and celebrate it no matter the history or the way of living of that mother and inspite of the difficulties and miseries she's been through.
Nine decades is assumed as a short time. Almost half of this time there were in our country several periods of dictatorships, corruption and authoritarism in power. Inspite of that, our country has a much more solid and progressive political tradition than other countries in the area. That short but strong tradition must not be forgotten or denied because if we deny the political tradition of one country we are uprooting the tree of freedom. Our progressive political tradition was represented by Varela, Céspedes and Martí. If we forget this tradition we are preventing the possibility of democracy to be born again, after the authoritarism that has never been absent in our past and present history. I am convinced that Cuba has had a great capacity for recovering in every sense whenever it has been faithful to the best of that democratic political tradition. Let me just mention some of the turning points of that cultural heritage of democracy which makes us capable of answering a recurrent question in our present history: What are the means, the instruments that are essential to our best political tradition?

-Let's go back to the first "hints of the 19th century". Medardo Vitier has gone to these hints and has advised us to create, in this century, the conditions to "unfold" these hints. By the early 20th century we already had two important institutions which were starting points for freedom in our country: "La sociedad económica de amigos del país"* and the San Carlos Seminary.
But Father Félix Varela was the first to denounce the indulgence of the "criollos"** and the need for independence and for the emergence of a democratic regime according to the advanced principles of that time. Félix Varela was a professor in the first existing school of "Constitutional Right" in Latin America. There he explained to the young in Havanna about the division of the three powers: legislative,executive and judicial. He explained about the importance of their mutual control in order to prevent absolute power (CF.R. "Escritos políticos" pg. Observación Cuarta, pg. 45-56)

* Economic Society of Friends of the Country.
** creoles.

Félix Varela wrote an important work: "Cartas a Elpidio*. There he made the following sugestion:
"Two things must be remembered when the Princes are establihed in a city or in a nation:
First: everyone is to participate in the Principate because this is the only way possible to garantee the peace of the people. Everyone must love and support that institution.

Second: As to the kind of government or establishment of the Principate, the best way is "virtue"; however this principate belongs to all because all are allowed to elect and be elected. Such is every mixed political body. It's a kingdom because only one rules; it's an aristocracy because many rule through virtue; and it's a democracy (that is, the people's power), because the princes can be elected out of the individuals that belong to the people; and because the people is the one that appoints them. this is a devine law..."("Cartas sobre la impiedad" carta II pg. 40-41)
Thus we can learn from Varela his concept on "political system". The first principle of such a system is the participation of all, in order to preserve peace and to support and love political institutions on the part of the citizens. So, the foundations for a democratic institution is the participation of all.
Through Varela we also learn that the essential means, instruments and mechanisms of the "best" political system (as he states) are the sharing of one's power with others. The Prince and this kind of "senate" which he calls "aristocracy of virtue" must be elected among the people and by the people. These are the foundations for what we would call today a "political model" which combines the presidential system with the parlamentarian system. But the president and the parlament must be elected by the people.
Varela says more: He says that a model based on these principles is a devine model and he tries to support this assertion through DEUTERONOMY'S book: 1-13-14 and from EXODUS 18,21. I understand that Varela didn't want to call "devine" any political system; he just tried to describe the elementary principles that garantee the authenticity of a democratic system. Anyway, even if we exagerate, we can say that democracy is rooted in the very origin of our political culture.
Even Father Varela himself clarifies it in this work when he says: "A system of government is like an architectural project. If it is right, the building will be beautiful; the stones are to be solid because if they fall down, then the greatness of the work will only unfold the enormity of the ruins". (Idem pg.58)
The persons are the stones of that beautiful building. Their solidness, their virtue, integrity and initiative will give life to that project of social architecture which is democracy.
Otherwise the building falls down noisily and the ruins frighten everyone who trusted only the social engineering and the architecture on the paper. Recent history strongly confirms Varela's opinion. We should bear it in mind in order to improve our future political system.
Here are some aspects Varela taught at the School of Constitutional Laws:
"The peoples loose their freedom either through a tyrant's opression or through the ambition and malice of a few, who use the very people to bring it to slavery whereas they claim they are liberating this people. The first cause is very well known, and even the most ignorants oppose to a tyrant's injustice. The second cause is more subtle and it is very difficult to grasp even by the most experienced politicians...So it is necessary to clarify the concepts of "national freedom" and the limitation of the first power, and also the concept of sovereignty; because man has inalienable rights and he cannot be deprived from them by any nation. If a nation should do such a thing, it is then a mean action, just like the most horrible tyrant would do...If the laws, under the influence of the rulers, attack the citizens' rights, then individual and national freedom is destroyed in the most sensitive way; in this case the people is driven to be its own tyrant because it has sovereignty to allow the legislation which is to make the very people a slave without resources. Thus the rulers become legitimate through that false sovereignty. (Observación segunda. Escritos políticos pg. 38-39)

The people born in Havanna at that time, who eagerly received this civic education given by Varela (and others later), laid the foundations for the nation based on these principles of sovereignty, democracy and freedom: Luz, Saco, Del Monte, Arango y Parreño, Garantes, Villaverde,
Mendive... The latter was Martí's teacher. Martí learned from Mendive all about the principles that made up the cuban nationality. The Apostle developed later hese principles and made them more splendid.

These principles were not always accepted by all. We must not forget that others born in Havanna were indifferent to Varela's teachings. He used to complain about the political apathy of his contemporaries. Others even rejected those teachings. There are always "stone-men" and "soft-men"; virtuous men and impious men. But Martí later wanted that "the building" of the cuban nation could be constructed "with the participation of everyone and for the sake of everyone". This is the first democratic principle that Martí stated. He always stood for a republic with a space for all".
Martí also absorbed the heritage of Céspedes' thought and also of Agramontes', and others. They elaborated the Guáimaro Constitution. This constitution made it possible to establish the first democratic regime which submitted the military power to the civil power and regulated the presidential power by the House of Representatives which was the legislative power elected by the people. The three powers, their independence and self control are instruments of democracy that have been regarded by our political tradition. Let's be faithful to this tradition.
There is an event in our history which has been sometimes seen as dubious. It has always been said that Céspedes was deprived from his charge as President of the "Republic at Arms", due to the contradictions between the leaders and due to some persons' meanness.

It's also been said that it was a tactic or strategic measure for the benefit of war. But what is clear for us is that the "citizen-president" and the parlament both had a very dignified attitude because they respected the people's sovereignty and the elected institutions that represented the people. That was an example of generosity given by the "Father Of the Land"*.This was also an attitude of respect for the democratic institutions.
Nowadays, I hear about Nixon's dismissal or Carlos Andrés Pérez dismissal or the trial to Alan García. These events are presented as amazing examples of democracy.
However, Cuba had an evident democratic behavior through the person of the first president Carlos Manuel de Céspedes who accepted the law and the powers of the democratic state. As to Céspedes, he didn't commit any crime. Martí made the most relevant document of the war of Independence: The Montecristi Manifesto. He teaches us:
"The land most be build out of her roots. She most have her own and specific feasable methods so that any government (without reality or punishment), cannot lead her to partiality or to tyrany"(Obras Completas". Tomo I pg.246)

One year earlier, on the ocassion of the third anniversary of the Cuban Revolutionary Party, he had explained his concept on politics, the function of parties and his own function within a democracy:
"Every public party must adjust to the people.Politics is, or is intended to be, nothing more than the art of guiding, with personal sacrifice, the different or opposed matters in a certain country, so that, without favoring improperly the impatiente of some, and without denying the need for order in societies (this order is only possible if there are rights), can the different components of the land live together without fighting and with liberty to aspire or endure, with the continuous peace of the acknowledged right; these components have the same right to representation and happiness. A people is not the will of only one man though pure that this will might be. It is not either the simple endeavor of undertaking an ingenuous ideal of a celestial spirit through a certain human group... Peoples are made up of hatred and love; more of hatred than of love; but love ( the same as the sun), burns and casts everything". (Obras Completas tomo I pg. 349)
There is a great coincidence between this principle from Martí and one of the documents of the church Social doctrine related to this topic. This document was solemnly proclaimed during the Vatican Concilium II because they realized about the lack of education for democracy. The document states: "It is compulsory to give civic and political education which is particularly necessary nowadays...so that every citizen can play his role in the life of the political community. There are always persons who are able, or are to be able to exercise the difficult art which is politics (and at the same time so noble). Those persons must be prepared for exercizing politics and must not refuse to devote themselves to it. They must leave behind their own interests and material advantages. They should fight against injustice and opression, against intolerance and absolutism either of a man or a party.They should fight with integrity and prudence, and devote to the service to all, with sincerity and honesty; moreover, with love and political strength"
("Gaudium et Spes", 75)
Martí then had a great trust in the prevalence of love. Moreover, he believed that the contents of politics must be a realistic love commited to reality. He goes over to pluralism in the country, diversity of opinions, the rightfulness of a political system in which the individuals and the political parties are submitted to the nation,with patience, with order and without wrath. The Apostle explains this through these words that I wish to recall:
" A people is a gathering of many wills, mean or pure; sincere or wrecked; hampered by shyness or hurried by ignorance. It's necessary to give up a lot, to attach a lot, to sacrifice a lot; we have to abandone phantasy. If there is confussion in the Land, it is necessary to identify the sinners...It's necessary to rescue virtue..." (idem pg. 350)

This is an excelent project for life for those who have chosen to stay in Cuba and work for her improvement. The Apostle is not a puritan. He is a politician who looks at reality and acknowledges that pluralism is not always made up of pure and sincere intentions. He didn't deprecate the shy and he didn't get amazed by the politically ignorants either. He rather encourages us to give up, to attach, to sacrifice, to abandone phantasy and to commit ourselves with the "possible", with those possible good things in a confused land where we can only identify the sinner if we rescue the virtue from the depth. If we give life to this phrase, many essential things will start to change for the better in Cuba. As we see, Martí's ideas don't accept the concept of only one party or group, though he founded only one. But, of course, he founded only one because any politician has ever founded two parties at the same time (certainly I haven't heard of that).
Martí said that it is a useless endeavor to try to implement a "heaven's ideal in a human group" without establishing the "acknowledged right" for the "different components of a society who have the same right of being represented".
I have a God feeing that we can get virtue and national unity out of diversity (just the way it is and not the way we dream it to be). And we might attain virtue and unity if we follow those principles which belong to the most genuine representatives of our political tradition.
We know already that in this century the Republic was born (together with frustrations and interference) and many times it has been hurt by authoritarism. But the democratic tradition and our rich Constitututional history reached their momentum when the Constitution of 1940 was made. Its progressive principles have been recognized by all. (C.F.R. Proyecto V congreso del PCC epígrafe 2 párrafo 28) I believe that we should make a more serene and pragmatic analysis on the political developments during the first half of this century in Cuba, if we are to criticize the flaws of a new-born democracy and if we are to clear up about the difference between real politics and the false politics and corruption that co-existed with that incipient democracy. Not everything was bad. Not everything was corrupt. Not everything was good. We cannot separate "the wheat from the weeds" and match one sector or ideology with the evil or the good, just as a block. In our culture and in every culture, everything was always (and it is)mixed. If we "go for it" together with the land, as Martí suggested, we are going to find sincere and mean ones, pure and wrecked, everywhere, every time... the most important thing is "to rescue virtue from the depth"

Now I'd like to try to rescue the image of our first Republic. There were flaws and trials. But at the same time, that Republic gave birth to men who intended to improve things. I'm going to read something that portrays some characteristics of one stage from that period:
"Once upon a time there was a Republic: It had a Constitution, it had laws and liberties; it used to have a President, a Congress, and Courts; everybody could get together, could associate, talk and write with full freedom.
The government didn't satisfy the people, but the people was able to change the government and there were only a few able to change the government and there were only a few days left to make it. There was a public opinion which was respected and accepted, and all the problems of colective concern were freely discussed. There were political parties. There were hours devoted to religious education on the radio and there were TV programs devoted to polemics. There were public celebrations and the people got excited by enthusiasm. This people had already suffered a lot by that time and it wished to be happy and it had the right to be happy. Many times it had been deceived and it got scared every time it looked to the past. The people blindly believed that the past couldn't come back; the people was proud of its love for freedom and everyone was certain that freedom would always be respected as a sacred matter. Everydody had the feeling and the certainty that nobody would dare do the crime of attacking the democratic institutions. The people wanted a change, an improvement, and it was close to it. All hoped about the future". (Fidel Castro. "La historia me absolverá" pg.81 y 82)

This document is also a part of our political tradition and we must bear in mind its whole message. In this document "La historia me absolverá", there is, as we can see, an acknowledgement of the five essential elements for democracy which are included in the Declaration of Viña del Mar . We've mentioned them at the beginning of this work. They are:
- Independence of powers.
-Representation of majorities and minorities.
-Freedom of expression, association and getting together.
-Access to information.
-Free elections.
We can learn out of any period of our history. Once we decide to improve our democracy, I would personally like to bear in mind all the time, all we've said about the republican period.
In 1976 the Socialist Constitution of the Republic of Cuba was approved. It was modified in 1992 and it is today the fundamental law of the Republic. The drafting of this Constitution was based on the experience of the socialist community and the former Soviet Union. Today, it still contains the essential aspects of the socialist model of the "proletarian dictatorship". But as every constitution,it has as well the possibility of being ammended in order to follow the undergoing changes, through a legal and ordered way.

UP


THE DEEPEST CHANGE TOWARDS A NEW DEMOCRACY

The world is changing all over. Society is a live organism. The changes have different names. The name is not relevant but it could be necessary in order to identify a phenomenon which really happens independent from our will. To name reality is, as Martí said, "to be away from phantasy" and to be responsible for life.
Sometimes political will doesn't determine reality, as it is sometimes desired. The name of reality doesn't determine it either. Life flows, it changes and it evolves. Any word should not be canonized or damned: Some say that changes are "quiet transitions", as Jian Zeming stated during the mourning farewell to Deng Ziaoping. Others refer to re-structuring; The Ibero American presidents have talked about a "process of changing", in their Declaration. They have also spoken about " reforms to political institutions, transformations in order to replace old functions", "to re-define the fronteers between the public and the private or "modernization and state decentralization "to improve the quality of political life" and "perfectioning of democracy".

In my opinion, the most important thing is not the way we name the changes, but what they are all actually about. The change as such doesn't garantee anything. Let's say it clearly though we might not like it: a change of government or even the change of the whole political system, wouldn't mean anything, or almost anything if there is not a deeper and radical change: the change in man.
Indeed, who are the persons that would re-structure society if men tend to maintain inside them the old ways of thinking and the structure that supported the old political framework? Which persons will carry out the transition to perfectioning democracy if ordinary men and women don't know about democratic protagonism and participation and they don't know about that practice? If there is not an antropologic change, then what citizens would form the real people that would replace the masses and would be the protagonists of deep reforms which will touch the essential thing, that is, the very man?

On the other hand, the Church Social Doctrine establishes the inseparable link between ethics and politics, between democracy and ethics. This doctrine is witnessing the present problems of indulgence, personal and administrative corruption, organized crime, and other evils that affect some present democracies. Regarding all that, the Church Social Doctrine states:
"The universal moral rules...are the unbreakable basis and the strong garantee for a fair and pacific human living together, and therefore the basis for a true democracy".
(U.S. No.96)
There is another danger regarding the close relationship that must exist between democracy and ethics and it is also pointed out by the Holy Father in "Veritatis Splendor": "There is a risk today which is serious too, due to the negation of fundamental rights of the human person and to the absortion by politics of the very religious interest that lies in the heart of every human being: we are speaking about the risk of the alliance between democracy and ethical relativism. This alliance deprives civil living together from any aspect of moral reference and deprives it from the possibility of realizing the truth...democracy without values turn to be a visible or unfolded totalitarism very easily, as our history shows" (U.S. No.101)

I have read with admiration the strongest criticism to capitalist society and its democratic system in a book by the present president of the Czech Republic, Mr. Václav Havel. This criticism leads us to the essence of changes and makes us realize the truth about western cultural systems and models because he means with brightness that the center of every political system is man:
"In democratic societies...there has to be a change in political principles and there will be necessarily a worsenning of something before they realize about that need. In our world, due precisely to the misery we are undergoing, politics has already made this change: there is not anymore the abstract concept of a "possitive" model which is perfect in itself...in the end, only the man submitted to that model and praxis remains".
"Naturally, every society has to be organized in a certain way. If this organization is to be at man's service, and not the other way around, it is necessary, above all, to free men and thus open a space for them to be fully organized; it is very absurd to organize men this way or another(by some persons who always know "perfectly well what man needs") in order to make them free", (so they say). ("El poder de los sin poder" pg. 88-89) This is, in the end, the great contribution of the peoples that, like ours, have experienced both ways of social organization. We don't want to go back, but to go forward to those changes that touch the origin of the problem: to change man and to make society, economics and politics be at man's service, and not the other way around.

The church has made a contribution to the effort of placing the human person at the center of the changes towards democracy. It is clearly stated by the Pope John Paul II in the "Centessimus Annus": "An important and even decisive help has been given by the church through its commitment with the defence and promotion of human rights. There have been places and environments where ideology had a strong presence and where partidist stands confused the conciousness of the common human dignity. In such occassions, the church has stated with humility and energy that every man- whatever his personal believes are- carries the image of God inside him, so he deserves to be respected. Through this assertion, the majority of the people has been reflected, and this has led to the search for new ways of striving and for political solutions more respectful for the dignity of the human person. Out of this historical process, new ways of democracy have emerged which offer new hopes for a change in the weak political and social structures... This is a responsibility that concerns not only the citizens in those countries, but also the chiristians..."(Centessimus Annus 22)
The deepest change towards a new democracy is thus the change in man. The human person is the subject, the center and the end of all political systems which are really democratic.. So, the terms to evaluate if a society is really democratic are: to check the structures and to verify if these structures are at man's service and if there are enough spaces for man. The fact of watching elections is less important than the fact of verifying if the persons are educated for being free and concious protagonists of these elections. If there are not free persons educated for freedom, there is not an effective and participative democracy. So was stated in the VI Ibero American Summit.

UP


DIMENSIONS OF GOVERNANCE IN DEMOCRACY

This important meeting of the heads of states in the region, also considered a series of dimensions that garantee and favor an environment that gives way to a greater governance in democracy.
Now, I'm going to try to say my personal opinion about the imlementation of these scopes to the specific characteristics of Cuba. I'll try to be faithful to Cuba's own political tradition. My opinion will be based on the Holy Faher's exhortation which urges the christians, specially the laics, to take responsibility and contribute, with their opinion, to create new ways of democracy through the perfectionong of what already exists.

International dimension:
"The political experience of Iberian American countries shows that democratic governance strengthens if there is an environment of international peace and security". So states the Declaration of Viña del Mar in its paragraph 10th and it mentions then some aspects that should be present in that environment:
-The process of globalization: risks, oportunities and negative effects.
-Integration and liberalization of commercial exchanges.
-Rejection to unilateral cercitive measures opposite to free commerce.
-To build a transportation net, communications for economical, social and cultural exchange in order to help regional integration.
-International cooperation against corruption, terrorism, drugs, arms dealing and other ways of international crimes.

In that sense, I would propose for Cuba:
1- To contribute to the seach for solutions in order to take advantages of the opportunities that globalization offers and to minimize its negative effects, thus preventing Cuba to be isolated from the region and from the world. Those countries would have then a consistent position regarding that attitude on te part of Cuba.
2-The regional integration and commerce should not be manipulated due to political reasons.Understanding must be through men's rights and peoples' rights.
3-The Helms-Burton law and all similar measures should be abolished in order to create a climate of deténte and thus there won't be any reason for a "harrassed country" by a neighbor nation so that any justification can't prevent from doing the necessary changes in order to improve our democracy. The measures of coercion don't have any justification, much less if they affect the population's basic needs. If there is the possibility of the cancelation of those measures eventually, Cuba should find the way to improve the relationships with the United States and begin a period of mutual and respecful exchange in the fields of culture, commerce, finance, etc. For that purpose, Cuba will need economic resources and also, and above all, it will need human resources prepared and educated in plurality and dialogue.
4.Cuba could make a contribution to that net of transportation and communication due to its geographic location and due to the richness of its culture and the high qualification of its professionals.
In short: Cuba won't be able to improve its democracy if it doesn't receive the proper attention in the international arena once Cuba begins to take the necessary steps. The stand of the European Union is closer to that wished situation.

Social & economic dimension:
The Declaration of Viña del Mar stresses in paragraph 16th: "the fact that democratic stability and economic and social development are categories that tend to reinforce mutually". In that sense the Declaration states:
- It is necessary that the state, without forgetting equality of oportunities, "looks for the necessary conciliation between economic growing and social development, and gives priority to social investments".
-It is necessary to promote an "excange of ideas and experiences regarding topics such as: proper tax systems, effective ways of social expenses... education, health, fighting agains poverty and ways of contributive help on the part of civil society".
-To balance the role of the state and private property knowing that these tasks "belong both to the public and to the private branches in economic development".
-To value possitively the participation of the "organized community in regions and municipalities" in the solution to social and economic problems.
-It is necessary too that democracy and technological modernization coincide. And also a coincidence between economic growing and social justice.

To Cuba, this dimension would mean that:
1.The perfectioning process of democracy should combine with the solution of the problem of including Cuba in the new ways of economy and viceversa
2.There should not be any restrictions that can be handicaps for new ways of democracy. These restrictions at the same time favor the adoption of new economic ways. The new ways of democracy, as we have tried to demonstrate in this presentation, perfectly coincide with
the best of our political tradition.
3. Cuba must balance the role of the state (which has been excesively paternalist for a long time) with the promotion of a private layer that starts an impulse to important branches of our economy. We cubans should be allowed to have private property, mixed and cooperative property and we should be allowed to invest once we have the necessary money. Meanwhile Cuba is not able to steadily be part of the economy of the region or go forward to a real sustainable development.
4.The free jobs and the possibilities of freely organized small enterprises and self-managed enterprises are other dimensions that will favor the stability of our political system towards a greater real democratization.
5.The provinces and municipalities of the country should implement their own management in order to have a higher participation in national economy. They should organize civil society once the state establishes its relationships with that civil society, under the principle of assistance. There should be a law that promotes decentralization of the state and administration, and gives more independence to provinces and municipalities.
6. The knowledge about social justice should be preserved. This knowledge was attained during the stage before the so-called "special period". This knowledge
should be also promoted with specific measures that show this principle that has been outstanding during the history of our land. For example we have the church social doctrine. All these measures will give credibility to the social system. The fact of combining the market free economy with social justice is the greatest challenge in social and economic dimensions in the present cuban process: a project of free economy could be an alternative for Cuba but it's necessary to bear in mind the specific present situation of underdeveloped country.

In short: Democracy in Cuba won't be able to attain solid basis for its perfectioning and stability, if, at the same time, we don't establish democracy in the economy, thus giving all cubans the right to private property, free employment and permission for external commerce and investments.


Political dimension:
As to the political dimension of governance in democracy, the Declaration of Viña del Mar says in its paragraph 19th and the others:
-" Governance in democracy means the representation and participation of all inhabitants of our countires, no matter their origin, race, religion or sex... because that is important for political democracy legitimacy.
- "That implies to acknowledge the contribution of majorities and minorities to the perfectioning of our democratic models"
- "The passing from a policy based on conflict to a policy based on cooperation, that searches for the union of ideas and efforts in order to solve the conflicts according to institutional principles, and respecting the rights for public debates"
-There must not be injury to any citizen regarding his fundamental rights in the name of a dogmatic perspective about society, the state or the economy".
- The importance of institutions that favor a more efficient defence of human rights and fundamental garantees, as the defenders of the people and the human rights promote".
-To improve the quality of politics, promoting its "ethic roots, the demand for values and the vocation meaning".
-To strengthen, from the first grades in school, the programs for citizen education for democracy and participation".
-To reinforce "responsibility of associations and political parties in the mid-levels, in the national representation and in the leadership selection, according to legislation and political traditions".
-To strengthen electoral systems that allow a more democratic representation of the population and a wider relationship between the electorate and their representatives".
-To develop the knowledge for mutual responsibility between citizens and authorities... In this mutual responsibilities lies a great part of transparence which is an important demand for democracy at present".
-To affirm and consolidate "honesty, transparence and responsibility as essential requirements for public service and for civil society activities, as well as for our political culture", thus preventing corruption.

In Cuba, we could implement these commitments, among others, during this stage in the following way:
1.Official acknowledgement of political minorities and their contribution to the perfectionong of our democracy,
accordng to te most genuine tradition coming from varela and Martí.
2.To widen the space for dialogue and political dialogue, social and cultural and economic ones, which are already being sponsored until these spaces can be part of our daily culture of debate, expressed and accepted without any fear, or hegemony of any group, religion or party.
3To facilitate the judicial procedures, through the established institutions or other newly created, in order to listen to the complaints from citizens and defend their rights and garantees.
4.To establish in the national education system in a steady way, a program for civic education that teaches about democracy and participation. Other institutions can cooperate in this task, for example, they can be open to a higher participation in the Seminars about Participative Democracy which are being held.
5. On the part of the church, the services for civic education and ethics should be continued and widened, according to the social doctrine and the cuban poitical tradition. The diversity of philosophies and believes should be integrated in all institutioal programs, not only to satisfy an individual right of each cuban, but to create the basis for a pluralist society from the very childhood and youth.
-The groups and organizations (even if they are a minority) that wish to propose economic, cultural, social or political alternatives, should try to become legal, and to strengthen their love for the homeland and they should stay in the country, in order to search for the possible improvement in the perfectioning of our democracy. The state could take steps in that sense inside legality and culture of debate. A new law for associations which would bear this in mind, would be a possitive step that all cubans and the international community would welcome.
6.Transparence and dialogue for the achievement of the former aspects must be the means to attain this sane balance among all political representations in the country. This is a country with a high level of instruction and with a beautiful civic tradition given by Varela, Martí, Céspedes, Agramonte, Frank, José Antonio Echeverría and many others. A country like this should know how to show the world an evidence of maturity and political tolerance. Without political transparence in information there would not be improvement in the perfectioning of our democracy.
7.The civil society should be developed and the citizens must find autonomous space in it, to exercise not only political democracy but also social, economical and cultural democracy. We must burry the belief that civil society and state have only mutual control relationships. There must be a greater understanding and cooperation for the common good.
In short: the political dimension of democracy should go forward in Cuba with the cknowledgement of minotities as valid opinions and sponsor constitutional changes that allow to overcome the situation of "proletarian dictatorship". The political perfectioning should have the same speed as the economic perfectioning and the improvement of international relationships. If we acknowledge in these relationships and in economy, the respect for the dialogue with different human groups and countries with different political orientations, then why don't we recognize, respect and talk with the ones that profess different political ideas inside the country? That would be the best way to strengthen our national unity according to diversity and to our sovereignty before the world, through concensus inside our home".
Since 1986, the ENEC wished this process to begin.There was stated. "Cultural evangelizing, thus understood, in the environment of our socialist country and counting on its own dynamics, postulates a real democratization, social, economic, political and cultural, on the basis of the values of justice, solidarity, participation and sane pluralism. It also asks that, without going back to past situations, a synthesis be attained between the own tradition and technical and scientific civilization which frees us from any way of dehumanization either evasive or technocratic" (ENEC No. 1166)

UP


GRADUALITY: THE WAY TO PERFECTIONING OUR DEMOCRACY

However, a sudden change has too many risks and consequences, that's why I believe that all we have formerly said could fail if we don't make everything gradually and effectively. It means moderate amd quiet changes, but essential.
In his speech at the 6th Ibero American Summit, the cuban president analyzed a series of "phenomena that affect the region in a greater or lesser extent. These phenomena are worth to be taken into account"-he said.
And he also stated: "If we are not fully aware of these realities, if we close our eyes and are not united, if we don't have the brightness and the energy we require at this relevant moment of our history, what will be the destiny of our countries in the 21th century...? what real possibility do we have to attain a real democratic governance with justice and hope for all?
I share this very concern and I believe that Cuba could give a contribution of unity, brightness and energy to the community it belongs to, on the way to perfectioning our political system.We should be faithful to Varela's tradition and to Martí's tradition, both of them having a relevant Latin American vocation. This contribution should be made by everybody, within an institutional environment which could be increasingly improved. Cuba has the privilege of knowing the two political systems which has characterized this century which is ending. Cuba can teach other nations about its experience and the lessons of its history in order to reach a participative democracy with social justice and a very strong hope.
I believe that the slow changes, within a civic dialogue, is the right way to perfectioning our democracy. With the effective graduality there won't be any going back to the past. We won't either loose the achievements of social justice up to what is possible in the international economic environment in which Cuba is now.
I think that graduality and moderation won't allow the desintegration of society because there will be time for us to be aquainted with the rich experience of a unity built on diversity and not only the uniformity which veils real plurality.
I think that effective graduality will allow cubans who live here and the ones dispersed all over the world, but who love their homeland, to find the best way for working together so that the future of Cuba can be better, without loosing our identity and preventing foreign interference that could tell us from abroad what we are capable of doing. It's better that we do it among cubans.

UP


CONCLUSIONS

1-Cuba is an inseparable part of the Ibero American Community of nations. That is Cuba's natural "house". We cubans will be able to deserve that house and we will improve it with our political maturity, our historical experience and our vocation for universal service.
The 6th Ibero American Summit has been a new step forward to embelish that common house. Governance for an effective and participative democracy is a topic that concerns all of our nations, but above all, it concerns each citizen beacuse the citizen is the "destination" of this sovereignty and protagonist of the changes so as to strengthen that sovereignty.

2.The principles for participative democracy that has stated the 6th Ibero American Summit fully coincide with the Church Social Doctrine and with the best political tradition in Cuba.

3.There are at least 5 fundamental reasons why Cuba should join the democratic transformations there proposed, and that the countries of the region intend to do. These 5 reasons can be among others:
-From the antropologic poin of view: because it contributes to personal development, to moral and
spiritual enrichment of all cubans.
-From the historic perspective: because it gives continuity and garantee to efficiency of the best cuban political heritage.
-From the economic point of view: because cuban citizens will have more motivations to work in an environment of greater freedom and participation. There will be also more credibility and trust for foreign investments and they will increase.
-From the perspective of international relationships: because it would allow the eventual and gradual opening to new spheres or regions such as the European Union, the very Iberio American Community and others.
-And from the perspective of inner policy: because it strengthens the state itself, it gives security to the ones governed, it improves civil society and strengthens the inner order and sponsors reconciliation and peace among citizens.

4. When looking at te future of Cuba and when we trust the common sense of all Cuba's children, in the wealth of our culture and in the moral reserves of our nationality, in our authentic democratic political tradition and in the great power that cubans have for recovering themselves. I wish to finish with an excerpt written by the Apostle which reflects my present hope:
"My chest is swelled by pride, and I love my land more from this moment on, and I believe even more and from now on in its ordered and serene future, in the redemption from the great danger of following blindly, in the name of freedom, the ones who take advantage of freedom craving to deviate it for their benefit; I believe even more in the Republic with open eyes: neither crazy nor shy; neither just nor unjust neither; overeducated nor illiterate; because I see ourselves, through sacred hunches, together in this night of force and thought; together for now and tomorrow; I see, together, as long as patriotism prevails, the cubans who sincerely and freely give their opinions about everything, and I see another cuban that respects these opinions. Because, if, regarding my Land I would be allowed to choose one good thing among others, one fundamental good thing for being the basis and principle of the country, without harming the rest of the good things, I would choose the following: I wish that the first law of our Republic be the worship of cubans to the full dignity of men". (Obras Completas Tomo I pg. 698)

Pinar del Río, 20 de junio, 1997.

(Classroom "Fr. Bartolomé de Las Casas", in San Juan de Letrán Seminary, Havanna, June 26th,1997)

UP